Many Trump supporters believed democracy was rigged. But it was not in the way they think with voting machines rather it is becase the whole establishment is ideogically controlled and democracy requires an informed electorate. But information is determed by the ideogically controlled establishment so left wing politics would not require voting machines to rig the elections.The populace is easily conned and with the whole establisment on their side governments can often safely ignore the will of the people.
Virtually all my emails and posts get ignored and although posts on my blog automatically go on twitter there is barely any response so I decided to make direct contact so I went to New York for three months but I was just ignored. I have been in Berlin for two months and again just ignored.It was then I thought of Elon Musk. I suspect he is coming up against ideology and most likely told obedience is a matter of national security. However unlike the prevailing ideology the ethical human rights I promote is firmly based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which is meant to be the authority of the United Nations. Ethical human rights has no human rights omissions but the establishment refuses to discuss them.
The woke led by Biden is, in my view, a demonic force but I am concerned that by the time the people realize it it will be too late (see ch on the UN in my book, mostly free on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog).
It is of vital importance that Elon Musk (&or Donald Trump) hears of this.If you can please let them know. I am a human rights author (two books), activist and outsider (33yrs) from Auckland, New Zealand. My first book seems to have been well read but my second book (Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope – American Acaddemic Press, 2017, which is mostly free on my blog) was suppressed, virtually, globally.I discovered decisions made at the United Nations which were not reported in the global mainstream media and which deterined the decline of the West. The UN determines ideology which the estalishment must obey or, in my view, lose their jobs. Ideology contains a number of human rights omssions which strongly favor elites and strongly suppress the potential of those outside the establishment. So when Elon Musk says the UK govt finances the BBC they do not have to because if anyone disobeys ideology they will surely lose their jobs.
For your information. I will be traveling to Europe for 3 months. I will arrive in Berlin on 28 February (traveling Lufthansa, business class) and staying at the Hotel Berlin for at least 3 days. It is close to Checkpoint Charlie and the human rights organizations I aim to visit. I hope to discuss my recent short article ‘Saving the European Union and Russia’ found on my blog. While I consider Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty a grave error of judgement I have sympathy for Russia having to deal with what I see as the gross deceit of the woke leadership of Biden e.g. Angela Merkel’s revelation on Minsk Agreement. But I do not see why Germany should sacrifice itself e.g. sending tanks, for Ukraine. I think Germany should be able to retain its peaceful path and continue to emphasize development. Humanitarian assistance to Ukraine is an option.
I am sorry the following was repeated. ‘They’ have made sure the internet is almost impossible for me to use with its incessant pop-ups. There was a time when I wrote two books with the assistance of the internet. I cannot see myself writing another. And here am I trying to help the woke who would be amongst the lowest form of life on the planet.
The Woke could adopt Ethical Human Rights.
In my recent posts I have shown how ethical human rights promotes peace i.e. between America, Russia and China, however it can also be adopted by the left wing so-called liberals (the woke). The major difference between the US Constitution and ethical human rights is the latter’s inclusion of economic, social and cultural rights e.g. the rights to health, employment and education, promoted by Bernie Sanders an American left-wing politician who has gained significant support in the population. The chapter on the United Nations in my book (much of which is free on my blog) shows how America was by far the major opposition to the UN’s One World Government which had the support of the great majority of States in the UN General Assembly. America’s opposition allowed Donald Trump the then US President to emphasize sovereignty and oppose globalization promoted by the great majority of States at the UN. However, in my view. The left so-called liberals sided with the great majority of States resulting in what can be described as a ‘schizophrenic’ America with Trump promoting the constitution and America first but the left wanting to preside over a One World Government supported the latter which my book describes aimed to rebalance ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. My book shows that on 10 December 2008 a new globally dominant ideology which I call Neoliberal Absolutism driven very largely by the left liberals who also dominate the UN bureaucracy was created. Neoliberal Absolutism was the ideology for a One World Government but as with America’s opposition was not reported by the global mainstream media which was also controlled by the left liberals. However, my work is verifiable with sources provided although the woke is so all pervading globally it ensured that my book was suppressed globally. In my opinion domestically the US Constitution will prevail in America but left liberals can remain progressive by adopting ethical human rights which is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethical human rights being universal it is reflective of the soul i.e. human rights are for everyone and not just strongly favouring elites. Starting afresh in this way the woke could save their souls and also with all the human rights included reach their full potential.
In my recent posts I have shown how ethical human rights promotes peace i.e. between America, Russia and China, however it can also be adopted by the left wing so-called liberals (the woke).The major difference between the US Constitution and ethical human rights is the latter’s inclusion of economic, social and cultural rights e.g. the rights to health, employment and education, promoted by Bernie Sanders an American left-wing politician who has gained significant support in the population.The chapter on the United Nations in my book (much of which is free on my blog) shows how America was by far the major opposition to the UN’s One World Government which had the support of the great majority of States in the UN General Assembly.
America’s opposition allowed Donald Trump the then US President to emphasize sovereignty and oppose globalization promoted by the great majority of States at the UN. However, in my view. The left so-called liberals sided with the great majority of States resulting in what can be described as a ‘schizophrenic’ America with Trump promoting the constitution and America first but the left wanting to preside over a One World Government supported the latter which my book describes aimed to rebalance ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. My book shows that on 10 December 2008 a new globally dominant ideology which I call Neoliberal Absolutism driven very largely by the left liberals who also dominate the UN bureaucracy was created. Neoliberal Absolutism was the ideology for a One World Government but as with America’s opposition was not reported by the global mainstream media which was also controlled by the left liberals. However, my work is verifiable with sources provided although the woke is so all pervading globally it ensured that my book was suppressed globally. In my opinion domestically the US Constitution will prevail in America but left liberals can remain progressive by adopting ethical human rights which is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethical human rights being universal it is reflective of the soul i.e. human rights are for everyone and not just strongly favouring elites. Starting afresh in this way the woke could save their souls and also with all the human rights included reach their full potential.The Woke could adopt Ethical Human Rights. In my recent posts I have shown how ethical human rights promotes peace i.e. between America, Russia and China, however it can also be adopted by the left wing so-called liberals (the woke). The major difference between the US Constitution and ethical human rights is the latter’s inclusion of economic, social and cultural rights e.g. the rights to health, employment and education, promoted by Bernie Sanders an American left-wing politician who has gained significant support in the population. The chapter on the United Nations in my book (much of which is free on my blog) shows how America was by far the major opposition to the UN’s One World Government which had the support of the great majority of States in the UN General Assembly. America’s opposition allowed Donald Trump the then US President to emphasize sovereignty and oppose globalization promoted by the great majority of States at the UN. However, in my view. The left so-called liberals sided with the great majority of States resulting in what can be described as a ‘schizophrenic’ America with Trump promoting the constitution and America first but the left wanting to preside over a One World Government supported the latter which my book describes aimed to rebalance ideological and economic power from the West to the Rest. My book shows that on 10 December 2008 a new globally dominant ideology which I call Neoliberal Absolutism driven very largely by the left liberals who also dominate the UN bureaucracy was created. Neoliberal Absolutism was the ideology for a One World Government but as with America’s opposition was not reported by the global mainstream media which was also controlled by the left liberals. However, my work is verifiable with sources provided although the woke is so all pervading globally it ensured that my book was suppressed globally. In my opinion domestically the US Constitution will prevail in America but left liberals can remain progressive by adopting ethical human rights which is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ethical human rights being universal it is reflective of the soul i.e. human rights are for everyone and not just strongly favouring elites. Starting afresh in this way the woke could save their souls and also with all the human rights included reach their full potential.
I have reposted this short article because I made a mistake when I wrote neoliberalism instead of Neoliberal Absolutism and I do not know how to correct it:
What is the truth? What is the spiritual? In human rights this is easy to understand. People’s human rights are contained within the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) which the United Nations regards as its authority. When human rights are left out it is called ideology e.g. neoliberalism is well known.
The chapter in my book on the United Nations (provided for free, in sections, on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) describes the human rights omissions which strongly favour the elites. For example, individual self-determination is replaced by collective self-determination which means society is dominated by collectives rather than individual rights which the UDHR is meant to emphasize. Human rights are meant to be for everyone i.e it reflects the soul not strongly favouring the interest of elites. In my view, this universality reflects the spiritual nature of the soul
Prior to the onset of neoliberalism in 1984 in New Zealand members of collectives had individual freedom of thought, conscience and expression but post 1984 members had to obey ideology. It often meant members had to compromise their universal beliefs i.e their soul, which not only jeopardized their transition for those that believed in an afterlife (hence the expression, ‘selling one’s soul’) but also seriously limited their ability to reach their full potential because they had to ignore a number of human rights.
Lisa Miller Professor of Psychology and education of Columbia University, Science of Spirit, provides proof (e.g. Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI scan) of the existence of spirituality in her book, The Awakened Brain, https://www.rt.com/shows/worlds-apart-oksana-boyko/549859-science-spirit-existence-transcendent/. In my personal view God is the creative force or genius within. While the common belief in family need not be limiting because human rights are about the human family.
Peter J Adams Professor of social and community health at Auckland University in his book, ‘How to talk about spiritual encounters’ states:
“While a sizeable proportion of people (varying between 30-60%) admit to having had some form of spiritual encounter, many struggle to speak with anyone else about them. Some might choose to avoid talking about them altogether, even to those who are closest to them…” (‘Our reluctance to speak about spiritual encounters’, Our reluctance to speak about spiritual encounters | Peter J Adams ).
Our reluctance to speak about spiritual encounters | Peter J Adams
I have written two books on ethical human rights which simply means that all are entitled to, at least, the core minimum of all the human rights in the UDHR (the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights have determined nearly all the core minimums for ESC rights). In other words, in ethical human rights there are no human rights omissions, and it is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the UDHR. Put simply, people are protected from extreme violence and extreme poverty. It also means that supranational bodies such as the UN and the EU can hold States to account if they violate these core minimum human rights. Under ethical human rights States have a duty to assist (where possible) those States who are unable to ensure core minimum human rights for their population. For example, all 194 States would have a duty to assist with refugees.
In my chapter on Bangladesh I show how ethical human rights equate with the Golden Rule (‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’) which is promoted by all the major religions indicating its spiritual dimension.
Ethical human rights, which emphasizes sovereignty and individual rights, poses a very serious challenge to, and promises to replace, Neoliberal Absolutism which is totalitarian and emphasizes collectivism.
Members of the collectives being controlled by ideology are unable to talk about ethical human rights but they can talk about spirituality which would help people better understand the vital importance of the distinction between universality and ideology. In my book I show how ideology crushes the potential of the independent people leading to backward societies.
My comment on Life, Death and all between, ‘Get the United States out of the United Nations and the World Health Organization A.S.A.P’ :
“I would strongly suggest you read my book, Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press 2017) which I have provided for free, in sections, on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. See the chapter on the UN. You will see that on 10 Dec 2008 the UN created a new globally dominant ideology I call Neoliberal Absolutism which is essentially the ideology for a One World Government. It was never reported in the global mainstream media but my work is verifiable with sources. My book was severely suppressed world-wide. A few months back I travelled to New York and sat outside the UN with my book on display. Neoliberal Absolutism aims to have a form of totalitarianism in each country. While the US was the by far the major opposition to NA which allowed Trump to promote patriotism [and oppose globalism] in my view the liberals (woke) adopted Neoliberal Absolutism so when it came to America they were very destructive. In my view, America will only come right when it insists that the constitution is strictly followed e.g. I consider the woke should be arrested when they attempt to cancel freedom of speech. My phone number is (09) 9409658, Auckland, New Zealand”.
What is the truth? What is the spiritual? In human rights this is easy to understand. People’s human rights are contained within the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) which the United Nations regards as its authority. When human rights are left out it is called ideology e.g. neoliberalism is well known.
The chapter in my book on the United Nations (provided for free, in sections, on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) describes the human rights omissions which strongly favour the elites. For example, individual self-determination is replaced by collective self-determination which means society is dominated by collectives rather than individual rights which the UDHR is meant to emphasize. Human rights are meant to be for everyone i.e it reflects the soul not strongly favouring the interest of elites. In my view, this universality reflects the spiritual nature of the soul
Prior to the onset of neoliberalism in 1984 in New Zealand members of collectives had individual freedom of thought, conscience and expression but post 1984 members had to obey ideology. It often meant members had to compromise their universal beliefs i.e their soul, which not only jeopardized their transition for those that believed in an afterlife (hence the expression, ‘selling one’s soul’) but also seriously limited their ability to reach their full potential because they had to ignore a number of human rights.
Lisa Miller Professor of Psychology and education of Columbia University, Science of Spirit, provides proof (e.g. Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI scan) of the existence of spirituality in her book, The Awakened Brain, https://www.rt.com/shows/worlds-apart-oksana-boyko/549859-science-spirit-existence-transcendent/. In my personal view God is the creative force or genius within. While the common belief in family need not be limiting because human rights are about the human family.
Peter J Adams Professor of social and community health at Auckland University in his book, ‘How to talk about spiritual encounters’ states:
“While a sizeable proportion of people (varying between 30-60%) admit to having had some form of spiritual encounter, many struggle to speak with anyone else about them. Some might choose to avoid talking about them altogether, even to those who are closest to them…” (‘Our reluctance to speak about spiritual encounters’, https://pj-adams.blogs.auckland.ac.nz/2020/09/28/our-reluctance-to-speak-about-spiritual-encounters/ ).
I have written two books on ethical human rights which simply means that all are entitled to, at least, the core minimum of all the human rights in the UDHR (the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights have determined nearly all the core minimums for ESC rights). In other words, in ethical human rights there are no human rights omissions, and it is firmly based on universal human rights truth as in the UDHR. Put simply, people are protected from extreme violence and extreme poverty. It also means that supranational bodies such as the UN and the EU can hold States to account if they violate these core minimum human rights. Under ethical human rights States have a duty to assist (where possible) those States who are unable to ensure core minimum human rights for their population. For example, all 194 States would have a duty to assist with refugees.
In my chapter on Bangladesh I show how ethical human rights equate with the Golden Rule (‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you’) which is promoted by all the major religions indicating its spiritual dimension.
Ethical human rights, which emphasizes sovereignty and individual rights, poses a very serious challenge to, and promises to replace, Neoliberalism which is totalitarian and emphasizes collectivism.
Members of the collectives being controlled by ideology are unable to talk about ethical human rights but they can talk about spirituality which would help people better understand the vital importance of the distinction between universality and ideology. In my book I show how ideology crushes the potential of the independent people leading to backward societies.
My comment on Life, Death and all between, ‘Get the United States out of the United Nations and the World Health Organization A.S.A.P’ :
“I would strongly suggest you read my book, Ethical Human Rights: Freedom’s Great Hope (American Academic Press 2017) which I have provided for free, in sections, on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog. See the chapter on the UN. You will see that on 10 Dec 2008 the UN created a new globally dominant ideology I call Neoliberal Absolutism which is essentially the ideology for a One World Government. It was never reported in the global mainstream media but my work is verifiable with sources. My book was severely suppressed world-wide. A few months back I travelled to New York and sat outside the UN with my book on display. Neoliberal Absolutism aims to have a form of totalitarianism in each country. While the US was the by far the major opposition to NA which allowed Trump to promote patriotism [and oppose globalism] in my view the liberals (woke) adopted Neoliberal Absolutism so when it came to America they were very destructive. In my view, America will only come right when it insists that the constitution is strictly followed e.g. I consider the woke should be arrested when they attempt to cancel freedom of speech. My phone number is (09) 9409658, Auckland, New Zealand”.
India seems to have an independent foreign policy which enables them to remain any ally of America but also import oil from Russia so why can’t the States of the European Union. This would not negate the existence of the EU if the latter adopted ethical human rights and only held States to account if they violated the core minimum of the human rights of the Universal Declaration of Human rights i.e. such as in cases of extreme violence or extreme poverty. Because the EU only deals with core minimum human rights it would allow States considerable sovereignty in determining higher levels of human rights and would not have to engage in cancelling Russia culture. And most importantly because some States would decide to import oil from Russia this would help ensure Russia is not totally isolated from the European Union which seems to be driven largely by America i.e the cancel culture of the woke. This would help save the European Union from decline and also seem to lessen the likelihood of nuclear war. Also, ethical human rights being based on universal human rights truth it would add a spiritual dimension to the EU because human rights would be for all which reflects the soul rather than strongly favouring elites which is the case under neoliberalism which prioritizes collectives over individual rights which the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is meant to emphasize. Also, neoliberalism uses social class discrimination to crush the potential of the independent people creating a more intellectually backward tribal society. The latter is most explicitly seen with Maori tribalism which discriminates on the ground of birth (whakapapa) creating many social outcasts. In my view, New Zealanders fear being call racist so do not criticise Maori culture (whereas I do not care see my blog and book, which is free, in sections, on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.com.blog).
Both the UN and America crush the potential of those low on the social scale ensuring violent responses.
America, in my view, is a disaster waiting to happen. I arrived in New York one month ago. My aim was to address the United Nations General Assembly and promote ethical human rights which is firmly based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and unlike the ideology, I call Neoliberal Absolutism, created at the UN on 10 Dec 2008, contains no human rights omissions. I doubt I would have travelled to New York if my book was not very seriously suppressed globally. I consider it contained extremely important information that government did not want the people to know about.
As shown in the chapter on the UN in my book (provided for free on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog) the human rights omissions, determined by the great majority of the States in the general assembly, enabled the crushing of the potential of those low on the social scale. But my aim to address the UN General Assembly could take a long time to achieve. No one within the UN was prepared to meet with me and security officers abound ensuring no entry to the UN or associated organizations. All I could do was sit outside the UN with my book on display.
It was during that time that America suffered some of its worse acts of mass violence. https://www.npr.org/2022/05/15/1099008586/mass-shootings-us-2022-tally-number (‘22 weeks into the year, America has already seen at least 246 mass shootings’, 5 June, Safeed Ahmed). I believed I could help because I saw that America is using social class discrimination (described in my book) was, like the UN, also engaged in crushing the potential of those low on the social scale. I considered that when those individuals saw that the American Dream was not meant for them they would get extremely angry and respond with violence targeting those they saw as standing in their way from improving themselves. This could be blacks, whites, Chinese, Jews or others. In the case of the shooting of school children it was the targeting those society held most precious.
The focus of a solution, (mainly by the Democrats but seemingly supported by many Republicans) to the violence is gun control. One of the leaders of the latter solution is the black Major Eric Adams of New York City who wanted federal help to fight gun violence.
I made contact with the Jewish synagogue in New York hoping to discuss social class discrimination with the Rabbi but they would not talk with me. American civil liberties would not talk with me. Even the National Rifle Association who you would expect to oppose gun control and want to protect the constitution would not talk to me. I even approached the New York police department but they would not talk to me. I concluded they were all operating from a political script which they would not deviate from.
The political scrip, in my view, was devised to keep the truth i.e. social class discrimination and the human rights omissions of the UN, hidden from the American people.
Recently Joe Biden, President of the United States, stated: ‘There’s going to be a New World Order’ and he wants America to lead it (Biden says ‘new world order’ is coming and ‘America must lead it’, American Military News, March 1, 2022.
For him, in my view, the ends justify the means even if requires a limited form of gun control and the killing of more school children. He wants to remain ‘in sync’ with the UN’s ideology (Neoliberal Absolutism) which aims to crush the potential of those low on the social scale so America can lead the new world order.
I tried for two years to get Donald Trump to tell Americans about my book but he didn’t. It is clear to me that he is not prepared to jeopardise America’s chance of leading the new world order.
Those low on the social scale I did get the opportunity to talk to about social class discrimination and how their potential is being crushed understood very well what I was saying. But the establishment say nothing except when I made a stand on principle and appeared in the Auckland High Court and told the presiding judge that those at the bottom were crushed and isolated. He agreed with me (see chapter on New Zealand on my blog).
Because America refuses to address the real cause of the violence it is very likely to continue.
My latest post: En Route to address the UN General Assembly to promote ethical human rights. I will be flying fron Auckland on 6 May to New York. There will be a stop over in Los Angeles. More details can be found on my blog, https://outsiderethicalhumanrights.home.blog
My book describes the ideology of what would be the New World Order (see the chapter on the United Nations, free on my blog). I call it neoliberal absolutism. It is an ideology because it omits many human rights designed to seriously limit creativity which would determine the decline of western culture resulting in a decline of global freedom. The human rights omissions were determined by the great majority of States at the United Nations wanting globalization, totalitarian control over their countries and keeping their populations backward. By far the major opposition to neoliberal absolutism at the UN was America. The latter allowed Trump to oppose globalization and emphasise sovereignty, the constitution and patriotism..However, in my view, the democrats followed neoliberal absolutism aiming to destroy American freedom. They are called the ‘woke’ a culture promoted by the deep State and permeating the institutions and corporations within the country. The woke dominate western countries e.g. Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and are determing the decline of the West. However with respect to America if Trump wins the next election he is likely to reverse this process. I consider the reason the woke are allowed to dominate, including by Trump, is because they follow neoliberal absolutism and aim to preside over the new world order.
Outsider, Ethical Human Rights 